BIMCO’s DRY BULK TERMINALS VETTING REPORT FOR 2018
Abstract
Based on data collected from ships’ visits to dry bulk terminals, this report evaluates dry bulk terminals’ performance during the period from January 2015 to December 2018.
After each port call, ships’ officers complete and submit a quick survey.
The questionnaire is divided into the following five main categories:
After receiving a minimum of five reports for a particular terminal, the results will be shown with a star rating, which provides a quick overview of its performance.
All information submitted in response to the dry bulk terminal vetting questionnaire will be anonymised so that your identity and that of your ships remains confidential.
BIMCO will protect all such information from unauthorised access, use, disclosure, modification, loss or theft.
The table below shows the status of the 38 terminals that have received more than five reports. The results of the vetting scheme will be updated on the website twice a year on 1 January and 1 July.
| NAME | COUNTRY | UN/LOCODE |
| Szczecin | Poland | PL-SZZ |
| Quebec | Canada | CA-QUE |
| Newcastle | Australia | AU-NTL |
| Gladstone | Australia | AU-GLT |
| Ciénaga | Colombia | CO-CIE |
| Port of Moa | Cuba | CU-MOA |
| Rio Haina | Dominican Republic | DO-HAI |
| Santander | Spain | ES-SDR |
| Devonport | Australia | AU-DPO |
| Dampier | Australia | AU-DAM |
| Bilbao | Spain | ES-BIO |
| Thunder Bay | Canada | CA-THU |
| Santa Marta | Colombia | CO-SMR |
| Richards Bay | South Africa | ZA-RCB |
| Cristobal | Panama | PA-CTB |
| Puerto Cortes | Honduras | HN-PCR |
| Port Alfred | Canada | CA-PAF |
| Baton Rouge | United States of America | US-BTR |
| Puerto Cabello | Venezuela | VE-PBL |
| Galveston | United States of America | US-GLS |
| Xiamen | China | CN-XMN |
| Pointe-à-Pitre | Guadeloupe | GP-PTP |
| Port Hedland | Australia | AU-PHE |
| Tampa | United States of America | US-TPA |
| Tianjin | China | CN-TXG |
| Vancouver | Canada | CA-VAN |
| New Orleans | United States of America | US-MSY |
| Cartagena | Colombia | CO-CTG |
| Fort-de-France | Martinique | MQ-FDF |
| Point Comfort | United States of America | US-PCR |
| Port Arthur | United States of America | US-POA |
| Veracruz | Mexico | MX-VER |
| Barranquilla | Colombia | CO-BAQ |
| Kingston | Jamaica | JM-KIN |
| Houston | United States of America | US-HOU |
| Altamira | Mexico | MX-ATM |
| Port-au-Prince | Haiti | HT-PAP |
| Lake Charles | United States of America | US-LCH |
Once a year BIMCO will publish a detailed report, which presents the collected data in a structured and accessible format. The report will contain figures and charts for a simple comparison and ranking of each terminal’s performance, together with comments received from ships. The report will be free of charge for BIMCO members. The report can be used as guidance for planning calls at terminals around the world. The data gathered will be published through the appropriate BIMCO media and the results will be an important tool in the dialogue between ships, owners and terminals especially when encouraging terminals to improve any identified failings.
Please be aware that this isn’t a “one-off” survey. We need ships to complete the questionnaire every time they leave a terminal to keep the information available up to date. It is therefore really important we receive as much data as possible. The number of reports is directly linked to the data quality thereby ensuring the strength and value of the information we will provide. Obtaining first-hand user information in this way enables BIMCO to gather the knowledge necessary to compare the performance of terminals around the world and provide a useful service to the industry.
Source: BIMCO